Too Soon? Then when?

It's too soon, cry the voices in support of White House policy. Iraq isn't ready.

In 2002, Iraq ran fairly smoothly. Saddam Hussein was a dictator--that's beyond argument. However, he had been propped up for many years by U.S. diplomacy. There were shortages, too, but these had been caused by a 12-year embargo instituted by the U.S.

Iraq was not perfect in 2002, but there was structure in the lives of Iraqis. Schools and workplaces operated efficiently. The electricity worked. Most Iraqis were comfortable enough.

All this was destroyed during the period of shock and awe as American bombs rained down and American soldiers patroled the streets. Now, four years into the war, Iraq is in shambles.

The U.S. must maintain a humanitarian presence in the country destroyed by American weapons. But a military presence? How does that promote democracy? How can violence bring an end to violence?

The fighting won't stop when the U.S. leaves, but it will subside. Then it will be time for Iraqis to figure out how to rebuild their country--with substantial help from those who destroyed it.

How much "terror" in Iraq is born of the need for independence? At this rate, we'll never find out.

Imagine foreign soldiers patroling your neighborhood. Then tell me if the U.S. military should stay.